Back to all local authorities
Vale of White Horse Self-Build Register Data
Vale of White Horse has an outstanding deficit of 417 plots
Since 2016, 671 people have registered interest in self-build here. Vale of White Horse has permitted 167 plots.
Part 1 registrations
671
legal duty applies
Part 2 registrations
0
local eligibility
Plots permitted
167
since 2016
Current deficit
417
Period 7 (2022)
People on Vale of White Horse's self build register
Each icon represents 10 people on the self build register.
People on Vale of White Horse's self build register
671
No registrations recorded
Part 1: 671Part 2: 0
How has demand evolved?
The chart below tracks cumulative Part 1 demand, combined Part 1+2 demand, permissions granted, and the total outstanding demand over time.
Loading chart...
⚠️Errors and inconsistencies in reported demand data
OriginalAdjusted
Summary of Errors Found
- Missing Part 1/Part 2 Breakdown: No entries contained a breakdown of Part 1 vs Part 2. As the
local_connection_testwas consistentlynullorfalse, all individuals and groups were assigned to Part 1. - 2017 Start Balance Inconsistency (Individuals): The 2016 End of Period was 22, but the 2017 data (Added 117, End 185) implies a Start balance of 68. The Start was adjusted to 68 (rather than 22) to align with the higher reported end totals.
- 2017 Start Balance Inconsistency (Groups): The 2016 End of Period was 0, but 2017 data (Added 2, End 9) implies a Start balance of 7. The Start was adjusted to 7.
- 2019 Totals Calculation Mismatch: Reported End (344) was lower than Start (267) + Added (96) = 363. The End of Period was corrected to 363 to prioritize the "Added" figures and higher registration numbers.
- 2019 Group Removal: Groups dropped from 10 to 8 with no removal recorded. "Groups Removed: 2" was derived.
- 2020 Totals Calculation Mismatch: Reported End (434) was lower than Derived Start (363) + Added (89) = 452. The End of Period was corrected to 452.
- 2021 Totals Calculation Mismatch: Reported End (540) was lower than Derived Start (452) + Added (98) = 550. The End of Period was corrected to 550.
- 2021 Group Removal: Groups dropped from 8 to 0 with no removal recorded. "Groups Removed: 8" was derived.
- 2022 Totals Calculation Mismatch: Reported End (617) was lower than Derived Start (550) + Added (77) = 627. The End of Period was corrected to 627.
- 2023 Start Discrepancy: Reported Start (598) was significantly lower than the derived 2022 End (627). To maintain consistency and account for all added entries, the 2023 Start was adjusted to 627 and End recalculates to 671.
- 2024 Start Discrepancy: Reported Start (642) did not match the derived 2023 End (671). The 2024 Start was adjusted to 671 and End recalculated to 714.
Detailed compliance calculations
The full breakdown of how the deficit is calculated, including how demand carries forward for three years while surplus permissions do not.
Cells highlighted indicate values changed by error adjustments
| Base Period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Year | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| Part 1 — Individuals Added | 22 | 117 | 82 | 96 | 89 | 98 | 77 | 44 | 43 |
| Part 1 — Groups Added | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Part 1 — Total Added | 22 | 119 | 83 | 96 | 89 | 98 | 77 | 44 | 43 |
| Part 1 — Cumulative | 22 | 141 | 224 | 320 | 409 | 507 | 584 | 628 | 671 |
| Part 2 — Individuals Added | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Part 2 — Groups Added | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Part 2 — Total Added | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Permissions Granted | 0 | 0 | 34 | 18 | 26 | 23 | 28 | 18 | 20 |
| Permissions — Cumulative | 0 | 0 | 34 | 52 | 78 | 101 | 129 | 147 | 167 |
| Permissions Matched to Base Period | 52 | 26 | 23 | 28 | 18 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deficit/Surplus for Base Period | 30 | -93 | -60 | -68 | -71 | -78 | -77 | -44 | -43 |
| Unusable Surplus Permissions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Outstanding Demand | 0 | 63 | 123 | 191 | 262 | 340 | 417 | 461 | 504 |
What's happening each year?
Looking at annual data shows whether registration rates are increasing or decreasing, and how permissions compare to new demand each year.
Loading chart...
What policies are in place?
Local authorities can implement various policies that affect self-build. Some restrict who can join the register, while others actively support self-build delivery.
Entry requirements
These policies can limit who is eligible to join the register.
Local connection test
Requires proof of local ties to the area
Financial viability test
Requires proof of ability to complete a build
Registration fee
Charges a fee to join the register
Support measures
Vale of White Horse has implemented 5 of 8 possible support measures.
Local Plan general support
Housing mix policy
Percentage policy
Supplementary guidance
Land allocations consideration
Supported specific projects
Housing strategy action
Neighbourhood plan support
Frequently asked questions
Understanding self-build registers and local authority duties.
Under the Self-build and Custom Housebuilding Act 2015, all local authorities in England must maintain a register of individuals and groups who want to build their own homes. The register helps councils understand demand for self-build plots in their area and plan accordingly.
Part 1 includes everyone who meets the basic eligibility criteria (over 18, seeking to acquire land in the area, and a British citizen/EU national with right to reside). Local authorities have a legal duty to grant enough permissions to meet Part 1 demand. Part 2 is optional and councils can apply additional local eligibility tests—such as local connection requirements—to filter applicants. While Part 2 numbers still represent real demand, there's no specific legal duty attached to meeting it.
A base period runs from 31 October to 30 October the following year. The first base period began on 1 April 2016 (when the duty came into force) and ended on 30 October 2016. Councils must count how many people joined Part 1 during each base period, then grant enough "suitable" permissions within 3 years of the end of that base period.
For each base period, we compare the Part 1 demand (registrations) against suitable permissions granted within the 3-year compliance window. If permissions fall short of demand for any base period, that shortfall becomes an outstanding deficit. Importantly, surplus permissions from one period cannot be carried forward to offset deficits from later periods—each base period must be addressed independently.
The legislation refers to granting permissions for "suitable serviced plots of land"—meaning sites with access to connections for electricity, water, and sewerage (or can be provided in a reasonable time). Councils can count permissions they've granted directly, as well as those granted on appeal or through permitted development. The permission doesn't have to be for a council-owned site.
Councils must: (1) maintain the register and allow eligible people to join, (2) have regard to the register when carrying out planning and housing functions, and (3) grant enough suitable permissions to meet the Part 1 demand from each base period within 3 years.
This data comes from Vale of White Horse's annual returns published by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC), Freedom of Information requests, and published council documents. We cross-reference multiple sources to verify accuracy and flag any inconsistencies. If you spot an error, please let us know.